ABSTRACT
Different psychosocial variables, such as socioeconomic status, family type and sibling position may be considered to be of great significance as it may influence child behaviour pattern in a dental treatment situation. 143 children in the age group of 3-14 years were selected randomly from the out patient department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental Wing, S. C. B. Medical College, Cuttack with an aim of assessing relationship, if any, between the magnitude of behaviour and the above mentioned psychosocial variables. Behaviour rating was done using Frankl behaviour rating scale. The results of the study reveals no significant relationship between socio economic status, family type and sibling position with child behaviour pattern, but a trend has been observed that children of high socio economic back ground behave more positively, children of a nuclear family exhibit more negative attitude and middle siblings show less negative behaviour than youngest and eldest.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adolescent Behavior , Anesthesia, Dental/psychology , Anesthesia, Local/psychology , Attitude to Health , Birth Order , Child , Child Behavior , Child, Preschool , Dental Care/psychology , Dental Cavity Preparation/psychology , Dental Prophylaxis/psychology , Family , Humans , Nuclear Family , Radiography, Dental/psychology , Social ClassABSTRACT
Os autores tecem considerações sobre o cuidado que todo paciente requer, não só através do simples conhecimento e da habilidade técnica, mas também do imprescindível interesse para com o paciente como "ser humano". Procura-se conscientizar os profissionais a respeito da natureza do homem como um "todo"; os tipos mais comuns de ansiedade e medo encontrados no paciente; os diferentes tipos de personalidde e sua importância na prática odontológica, além de sugestões psicológicas para o tratamento de pacientes portadores de alterações dentais
Subject(s)
Anxiety , Anesthesia, Local/psychology , Dental Care/psychology , Dental Anxiety , Dentist-Patient Relations , Fear , Pain , PersonalitySubject(s)
Anesthesia, Conduction/methods , Anesthetics, Local/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Local/pharmacology , Anesthesia, Local , Anesthesia, Local/psychology , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Edema/etiology , Facial Pain/etiology , Infections/etiology , Procaine , Anesthesiology , Angina Pectoris/etiology , Brain Ischemia/etiology , Diabetic Coma/etiology , Emphysema/etiology , Facial Paralysis/etiology , Hematoma/etiology , Hepatic Encephalopathy , Airway Obstruction/etiology , Paresthesia/etiology , Vision Disorders/etiologySubject(s)
Anesthesia, Conduction/methods , Anesthesia, Local , Anesthesia, Local/psychology , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Edema/etiology , Facial Pain/etiology , Hematoma/etiology , Infections/etiology , Poisoning/etiology , Trismus/etiology , Acetylcholine/pharmacology , Anesthetics, Local/pharmacology , Anesthesia, Local , Anesthesiology , Emphysema/etiology , Facial Paralysis/etiology , Dental Instruments/adverse effects , Ischemia/etiology , Nausea/etiology , Vomiting/etiology , Xerostomia/etiologyABSTRACT
Se hizo un estudio retrospectivo para evaluar los diferentes criterios cuando se trata de establecer el diagnóstico de Síndrome doloroso miofacial. Otras variaciones relacionadas con este síndrome fueron analizadas (hallazgos clínicos, ansiedad, depresión, edad, localización del dolor y terapéutica empleada). Diez pacientes eran mujeres, once pacientes eran mayores de 50 años de edad y doce de ellos presentaban niveles altos de ansiedad y depresión. El área corporal más afectada fue el área lumbar y los "puntos gatillo" se encontraron en el 100% de los casos. El abordaje terapéutico con mejor efecto sobre el dolor fue una asociacion de infiltración de "puntos gatillo" con anestésico local y un soporte psicológico adecuado con un uso razonable de antidepresivos o ansiolíticos